Home > Error Cannot > Error Cannot Represent Relocation Type Bfd_reloc_x86_64_32s

Error Cannot Represent Relocation Type Bfd_reloc_x86_64_32s

thats about par for the course. In this case, could you give me am example of code using asm directives which should compile on my 32 bit box ? Lee Previous message: [linux-audio-dev] Cross compiling the kernel Next message: [linux-audio-dev] Cross compiling the kernel Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] More Adding -m64 to CFLAGS/AFLAGS on a native > > 64bit biarch toolchain and it compiled without problems. his comment is here

Försök igen. But you're the first to bring this problem to my attention. > - disable CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION I just tried it here. I disabled CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION and it works perfectly. A power source that would last a REALLY long time If I am fat and unattractive, is it better to opt for a phone interview over a Skype interview? Clicking Here

The problem does not seem to be lack of x86-64 support in the assembler. But the build fails with: $ make ARCH=x86_64 [...] CC init/initramfs.o CC init/calibrate.o LD init/built-in.o CHK usr/initramfs_list CC arch/x86_64/kernel/process.o CC arch/x86_64/kernel/signal.o AS arch/x86_64/kernel/entry.o arch/x86_64/kernel/entry.S: Assembler messages: arch/x86_64/kernel/entry.S:204: Error: cannot represent relocation And it seems that it's supposed to work, but doesn't.

I added -m64 to the CFLAGS as per the gcc docs. Sprid ordet Det snabbaste sättet att dela någons Tweet med dina följare är genom att Retweeta. Same error. > > > > Ah. Question on the Sato-Tate conjecture I don't want to get lung cancer like you do Can Tex make a footnote to the footnote of a footnote?

It seems like CROSS_COMPILE= should not be needed if my standard gcc binary can produce x86-64 code. more stack exchange communities company blog Stack Exchange Inbox Reputation and Badges sign up log in tour help Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed I'm > still disgusted at having to use third party .debs to accomplish > something so utterly trivial. > > FWIW I tried -m64 as described in one of the other https://lkml.org/lkml/2005/12/9/177 These are the ones I have: amd64-libs amd64-libs-dev lib64gcc1 lib64gfortran0 lib64ncurses5 lib64ncurses5-dev lib64objc1 lib64stdc++6 lib64stdc++6-4.0-dbg lib64z1 lib64z1-dev libc6-amd64 libc6-dev-amd64 Yes...

Fix that up. So all that's needed to build an x86_64 kernel with the i386 Ubuntu 5.10 toolchain: - edit Makefile: add -m64 to CFLAGS and AFLAGS - disable CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION - make ARCH=x86_64 Lee Building binutils for target x86_64-pc-linux-gnu should help. > I thought that might be the problem so I installed an x86-64 binutils from: http://debian.speedblue.org I tried with CROSS_COMPILE="/usr/x86_64/bin/x86_64-linux-", but edited the Makefile But the build fails > with: > > $ make ARCH=x86_64 > arch/x86_64/kernel/entry.S:785: Error: cannot represent relocation type BFD_RELOC_64 Ubuntu/Debian provide a biarch gcc, but do not (did not?) provide a

Work more with Ubuntu and CentOS. useful reference At this rate > > > > it will have taken me 2 days to get this working. > > > Yep. I didn't realize when it says "AS foo.o" it really means it's running > CC, not AS. (I had also built a cross compiling gcc, but didn't realize it > was Fungerar inga Tweets för dig?

I symlinked /usr/bin/as to /usr/x86_64/bin/x86_64-linux-as and got the exact same relocation error. this content CC arch/x86_64/kernel/process.o CC arch/x86_64/kernel/signal.o AS arch/x86_64/kernel/entry.o arch/x86_64/kernel/entry.S: Assembler messages: arch/x86_64/kernel/entry.S:204: Error: cannot represent relocation type BFD_RELOC_X86_64_32S arch/x86_64/kernel/entry.S:275: Error: cannot represent relocation type BFD_RELOC_X86_64_32S arch/x86_64/kernel/entry.S:762: Error: cannot represent relocation type BFD_RELOC_X86_64_32S arch/x86_64/kernel/entry.S:815: msg: .ascii "Hello\n" it generates the error "write64bit.s:6: Error: cannot represent relocation type BFD_RELOC_X86_64_32S" while the following leaq msg(%rip), %rdi ... I added -m64 to the CFLAGS as per the gcc docs.

Same error. What the "project" is that you took the source from, assuming it's an open source project. Same error. weblink Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak [at] suse> Index: linux/arch/x86_64/Makefile =================================================================== --- linux.orig/arch/x86_64/Makefile +++ linux/arch/x86_64/Makefile @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ cflags-$(CONFIG_MK8) += $(call cc-option cflags-$(CONFIG_MPSC) += $(call cc-option,-march=nocona) CFLAGS += $(cflags-y) +CFLAGS += -m64

I've done it without all that making a separate > binutils non-sense. I am having another problem building, quite a bit farther along. If I jsut add -m64 to everything then it fails when it gets to the ia32 stuff.

rkiddy commented Dec 29, 2013 VirtualBox is telling me: Operating System: Debian (64 bit) Let me know how best to do it and I can get a more verbose description of

Can Klingons swim? So what is setting AS in the Makefile good for then? And how can I force the build process to use /usr/x86_64/bin/x86_64-linux-as rather than /usr/bin/as? But the build fails >with: > >$ make ARCH=x86_64 > [...] > CC init/initramfs.o > > I have successfully done this using Debian/Sid. 1.

What is the difference between "count proportions" and "continuous proportions"? Ken -- das eine Mal als Tragdie, das andere Mal als Farce rlrevell at joe-job Dec9,2005,1:35PM Post #13 of 36 (4342 views) Permalink Re: i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?) [In How to challenge optimized player with Sharpshooter feat Why was Gilderoy Lockhart unable to be cured? http://oncarecrm.com/error-cannot/error-cannot-represent-relocation-type-bfd-reloc-sh-imm8.html Only the very early x86-64 distributions set up the gccs like this until it was noticed that a gcc compiled for 64bit targets run noticeable slower on 32bit and needs more

Ny på Twitter? And I repeat, messing with CFLAGS should NOT be necessary. BTW: if there's a better way, please let me know. ...After I got this to work I kinda quit looking ;-) -- Jeffrey Hundstad Attachments: lin64.tar.gz (0.35 KB) rlrevell at joe-job Dec9,2005,5:28PM Post But then, alas: make[1]: Entering directory /home/ray/osv/build/release'
GEN gen/include/bits/alltypes.h
GEN gen/include/osv/version.h
AS arch/x64/boot16.o
LD boot.bin
AS arch/x64/boot.o
/home/ray/osv/arch/x64/boot.S: Assembler messages:
/home/ray/osv/arch/x64/boot.S:98: Error: cannot represent relocation type BFD_RELOC_X86_64_32S
/home/ray/osv/arch/x64/boot.S:99: Error: cannot represent

It ends > up with -m64 -m32 for the 32bit vsyscall files, but that seems > to DTRT at least in gcc 4. Description Brandon Potter 2014-11-08 05:04:39 IST I am using binutils 2.24 to try to write a string to standard out of screen. The > > 64-bit environment sets int to 32 bits and long > > and pointer to 64 bits and generates code for AMD's x86-64 > > architecture. > > > Tillbaka Nästa Nästa Tweet från användaren Föregående tweet Nästa tweet Följ Följer Avfölj Blockerad Häv blockering Pågående Avbryt 水の味 ‏@konyavic 28 juni 2014 Error: cannot represent relocation type BFD_RELOC_X86_64_32S 23:03 -

It stores the address of 0:, in other words the address of the int3 instruction. It would REALLY help (for future reference) if you posted: Some code that uses these macros. Sign in to comment Contact GitHub API Training Shop Blog About © 2016 GitHub, Inc. Perhaps if you ask on the > > > debian-amd64 some kind soul has unofficial packages you can use. > > > > Try here: > > http://debian.speedblue.org/ > > >

Contact Gossamer Threads Web Applications & Managed Hosting Powered by Gossamer Threads Inc. Inkludera den överordnade tweeten Inkludera media Förhandsgranskning Stäng Logga in på Twitter Kom ihåg mig · Glömt lösenordet?