Home > Error Cannot > Error Cannot Represent Relocation Type Bfd_reloc_64

Error Cannot Represent Relocation Type Bfd_reloc_64

What else may I try to fix the compile error (well, something different of using empty definitions as it is for the WIN32 case) ? more stack exchange communities company blog Stack Exchange Inbox Reputation and Badges sign up log in tour help Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed But the build fails >>>with: >>> >>>$ make ARCH=x86_64 >>> [...] >>> CC init/initramfs.o >>> >>> >>> >>> >>I have successfully done this using Debian/Sid. >> >> >> > >I added Thanks. his comment is here

How to remove the remaining part of a word in the shell What happens if anti-refelctive coating is fully ruined or removed from lens most outer surface? Lu wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 1:06 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 6:31 AM, H.J. The 32-bit > > environment sets int, long and pointer to 32 > > bits and generates code that runs on any i386 system. Ken -- das eine Mal als TragŲdie, das andere Mal als Farce kyle at mcmartin Dec9,2005,11:58AM Post #3 of 36 (4331 views) Permalink Re: i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?) [In https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49860

Personal Open source Business Explore Sign up Sign in Pricing Blog Support Search GitHub This repository Watch 301 Star 2,269 Fork 412 cloudius-systems/osv Code Issues 328 Pull requests 5 Projects I still need to add "-m64" to the CFLAGS and AFLAGS to get it to work at all, otherwise gcc is invoked in 32 bit mode, and they don't address the We recommend upgrading to the latest Safari, Google Chrome, or Firefox. Please see how >>> *movdi_internal_rex64 handles immediates. >>> >> >> For the testcase in: >> >> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49860 >> >> my goal is  to make TARGET_X32 to generate code very similar to

On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 3:00 PM, H.J. Problems with "+" in grep Train and bus costs in Switzerland What are the drawbacks of the US making tactical first use of nuclear weapons against terrorist sites? thaankx kanishk > > > Ramana > > > > On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 3:18 PM, kanishk rastogi <[hidden email]> wrote: >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: kanishk But the build fails > > with: > > > > $ make ARCH=x86_64 > > [...] > > CC init/initramfs.o > > CC init/calibrate.o > > LD init/built-in.o > >

Please fix the assembler to zero-extend this relocation. [1] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-07/msg01825.html Uros, H.J. Obviously, the #if _DEBUG ... It would REALLY help (for future reference) if you posted: Some code that uses these macros. https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2008-12/msg00253.html fi __MY_MAKE_RUNNING__=1 export __MY_MAKE_RUNNING__ pwd=`pwd | sed -ne '/\/home\/rostedt\/work\/kernels\//p'` if [ -z $pwd ]; then m="intmake" else m="amdmake" fi # prove to me that I'm running the right one echo $m

Uros. But the build fails with: $ make ARCH=x86_64 [...] CC init/initramfs.o CC init/calibrate.o LD init/built-in.o CHK usr/initramfs_list CC arch/x86_64/kernel/process.o CC arch/x86_64/kernel/signal.o AS arch/x86_64/kernel/entry.o arch/x86_64/kernel/entry.S: Assembler messages: arch/x86_64/kernel/entry.S:204: Error: cannot represent relocation Building binutils for target x86_64-pc-linux-gnu should help. > I thought that might be the problem so I installed an x86-64 binutils from: http://debian.speedblue.org I tried with CROSS_COMPILE="/usr/x86_64/bin/x86_64-linux-", but edited the Makefile share|improve this answer edited May 20 '14 at 22:36 answered May 20 '14 at 22:10 Mats Petersson 94.5k754134 add a comment| Your Answer draft saved draft discarded Sign up or

Please fix the assembler to >>> zero-extend this relocation. >>> >> >> It is about address range.  The  offsetted memory references are for x32 >> since they are OK for TARGET_32BIT. http://sourceware-org.1504.n7.nabble.com/Fwd-Error-cannot-represent-relocation-type-BFD-RELOC-64-td139365.html Really, try my method. These asm directives are 64 bit only ? I'm not sure what's going wrong.

Every place where THROW_BREAKPOINT() (the DEBUG_STOP_POINT() is never used) is used issues the compile error: "cannot represent relocation type BFD_RELOC_64." And now the questions: What does this code ? this content Lu PR target/48084 * gcc.target/i386/pr48084-1.c: New. * gcc.target/i386/pr48084-2.c: Likewise. * gcc.target/i386/pr48084-3.c: Likewise. * gcc.target/i386/pr48084-4.c: Likewise. * gcc.target/i386/pr48084-5.c: Likewise. Asking Client for discount on Ticket to amusement park Why is the TIE fighter tethered in Force Awakens? But the build fails > >>>with: > >>> > >>>$ make ARCH=x86_64 > >>> [...] > >>> CC init/initramfs.o > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>I have successfully

Cheers Nick « Return to Sourceware - binutils list | 1 view|%1 views Loading... If I jsut add -m64 to everything then it fails when it gets to the ia32 stuff. On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 2:44 PM, H.J. weblink If it is valid for TARGET_32BIT, > > > it should be valid for TARGET_X32. > > > > (define_predicate "x86_64_immediate_operand" > > (match_code "const_int,symbol_ref,label_ref,const") > > { > > if

But the build fails > > with: > > > > $ make ARCH=x86_64 > > arch/x86_64/kernel/entry.S:785: Error: cannot represent relocation type BFD_RELOC_64 > > Ubuntu/Debian provide a biarch gcc, but It ends up with -m64 -m32 for the 32bit vsyscall files, but that seems to DTRT at least in gcc 4. Toggle navigation Patchwork GNU Compiler Collection Patches Bundles About this project All projects Login Register Mail settings PATCH: PR target/49860: [x32] Error: cannot represent relocation type BFD_RELOC_64 in x32 mode Submitted

Can Klingons swim?

The > > 64-bit environment sets int to 32 bits and long > > and pointer to 64 bits and generates code for AMD's x86-64 > > architecture. > > > Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak [at] suse> Index: linux/arch/x86_64/Makefile =================================================================== --- linux.orig/arch/x86_64/Makefile +++ linux/arch/x86_64/Makefile @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ cflags-$(CONFIG_MK8) += $(call cc-option cflags-$(CONFIG_MPSC) += $(call cc-option,-march=nocona) CFLAGS += $(cflags-y) +CFLAGS += -m64 On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 5:53 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote: > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 2:44 PM, H.J. BTW: if there's a better way, please let me know. ...After I got this to work I kinda quit looking ;-) -- Jeffrey Hundstad Attachments: lin64.tar.gz (0.35 KB) rlrevell at joe-job Dec9,2005,5:28PM Post

I don't want to waste anyone's time, but if there is a simple fix, or if this is ill advised in the first place, let me know. Adding -m64 to CFLAGS/AFLAGS on a native 64bit biarch toolchain and it compiled without problems. So, do you have some sort of religious objection to using CROSS_COMPILE= when building for a processor that doesn't match the userspace ? http://oncarecrm.com/error-cannot/error-cannot-represent-relocation-type-bfd-reloc-sh-imm8.html Comment 7 UroŇ° Bizjak 2011-07-27 16:04:47 UTC (In reply to comment #6) > > > This testcase is about valid address for x86_64_immediate_operand > > > and x86_64_zext_immediate_operand.

If it is valid for TARGET_32BIT, > it should be valid for TARGET_X32. (define_predicate "x86_64_immediate_operand" (match_code "const_int,symbol_ref,label_ref,const") { if (!TARGET_64BIT) return immediate_operand (op, mode); ... } I guess the code above There is > a problem somewhere.